Pricing hub
Compare tool-by-tool pricing reads from one crawlable hub
Browse 23 pricing guides covering seat costs, plan structure, and who should actually pay for each product.
Original research
Check source and change evidence before relying on a price card
Compare official pricing URLs and verification dates across 20 tools, with team-size scenarios for the three decision-grade records.
- Free-tier signal
- 19/23
- Published paid floor
- 20/23
- Quote-risk checks
- 3/23
Guides where the tracked product has a free or free-starting plan that can lower pilot cost.
Guides with a comparable published monthly paid starting point for seat-budget planning.
Guides where public pricing is not enough and buyers should verify quote, usage, or enterprise terms.
ChatGPT
ChatGPT pricing guide
Break down ChatGPT seat and agent costs by Free, Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise so teams know when Chat, Work, Codex, and apps create real workflow coverage instead of overlapping subscriptions.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Plus: $20/mo
- Best for
- Teams that want one broad AI workspace before they buy more specialized tools.
- Avoid if
- Your buying case depends on IDE-native coding depth or a tightly scoped per-seat rollout budget.
Next compare: ChatGPT vs Claude
Claude
Claude pricing guide
Map Claude pricing and current model tiers so buyers can decide when Chat, Cowork, and Claude Code fit reasoning, desktop knowledge work, or engineering—and when their usage and governance needs require a higher tier.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Pro: $20/mo
- Best for
- Lean teams that want stronger analysis quality without immediately moving into enterprise-only sales motion.
- Avoid if
- You need a suite-native workspace standard where meeting capture, office documents, identity, and collaboration already live in Microsoft or Google.
Next compare: ChatGPT vs Claude
Gemini
Gemini pricing guide
Frame Gemini pricing for buyers deciding whether Google-native bundle economics beat paying for a separate AI workspace.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Workspace Business Starter: $8.40/mo
- Best for
- Google-centered teams that want AI inside Gmail, Docs, Meet, Search, and NotebookLM before they buy another broad assistant seat.
- Avoid if
- You are not standardized on Google Workspace or you need the strongest standalone assistant quality more than suite-level convenience and budget absorption.
Next compare: ChatGPT vs Gemini
GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot pricing guide
Explain GitHub Copilot pricing for individual and business rollout so teams can see when a cheaper coding seat is good enough versus premium alternatives like Cursor 3.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Pro: $10/mo
- Best for
- Organizations that want a more conservative, lower-friction coding rollout across many developers.
- Avoid if
- You already know the team needs Cursor 3-style local-cloud handoff, deeper workflow customization, or a dedicated agent workspace inside engineering.
Next compare: Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Devin
Devin pricing guide
Map Devin's Free, Pro, Max, Teams, and Enterprise ladder so engineering leaders can decide whether autonomous backlog execution is worth more than a standard coding-assistant seat.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Pro: $20/mo
- Best for
- Teams with recurring migrations, cleanup tickets, bug queues, or implementation chores that can be delegated, reviewed, and merged safely.
- Avoid if
- The team mainly needs everyday coding help, broad seat coverage, or cheap autocomplete rather than autonomous task completion.
Next compare: Devin vs GitHub Copilot
Atlassian Rovo
Atlassian Rovo pricing guide
Break down Atlassian Rovo pricing across Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, Teamwork Collection, and Rovo Dev so buyers know which Rovo credit pool, indexed-object allowance, and $20/developer coding seat they are really signing up for.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Rovo Dev Standard: $20/mo
- Best for
- Atlassian-centric teams that want bundled AI inside Jira and Confluence instead of another standalone workspace AI contract, and engineering orgs that would also buy Rovo Dev for terminal AI and code review on top of the same Teamwork Graph.
- Avoid if
- Your buying case depends on broad cross-stack enterprise search beyond Atlassian, a simple unlimited per-seat AI model without credit quotas, or a standalone coding cockpit outside the Atlassian environment.
Next compare: Glean vs Atlassian Rovo
Notion AI
Notion AI pricing guide
Use this guide to decide whether Notion AI should be paid for as a workspace operating layer, while separating bundled core AI from credit-metered autonomous work.
- Starting price
- Custom quote or no public paid floor
- Best for
- Teams that want AI Meeting Notes, Enterprise Search, Notion Agent, and database-aware work inside the same workspace where decisions already live.
- Avoid if
- You need a broad standalone assistant across many surfaces and Notion is not the team’s system of record.
Next compare: Claude vs Notion AI
Perplexity
Perplexity pricing guide
Map Perplexity Pro, Enterprise Pro, and Enterprise Max so research-heavy buyers can see when citation-first search is worth more than a general assistant seat.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Pro: $20/mo
- Best for
- Research, strategy, analyst, and knowledge teams that want cited answers and connected file or app search.
- Avoid if
- The same seat also needs to be your default writing, meeting, or code-adjacent assistant across many workflows.
Next compare: ChatGPT vs Perplexity
Bolt
Bolt pricing guide
Map Bolt's Free, Pro, Teams, and Enterprise pricing so app-builder buyers can budget around tokens, hosted output, team seats, and admin controls.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Pro: $25/mo
- Best for
- Individuals and teams building hosted prototypes, websites, or lightweight apps where generation, hosting, databases, and delivery features need to stay close together.
- Avoid if
- The team needs deep existing-codebase engineering, predictable non-token usage, or broad collaboration economics that are not tied to per-member team seats.
Next compare: Bolt vs Lovable
Cursor
Cursor pricing guide
Break down Cursor's Hobby, Pro, Pro+, Ultra, Teams, and Enterprise tiers so buyers can see when Cursor 3's unified agent workspace is worth paying more than a cheaper coding seat.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Pro: $20/mo
- Best for
- Engineering teams that will regularly use the Agents Window, local-cloud handoff, shared MCP workflows, or Design Mode strongly enough to justify premium seat cost.
- Avoid if
- You mainly need cheaper broad developer coverage and do not expect premium multi-agent workflow depth or self-hosted security advantages to become normal.
Next compare: Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
CustomGPT.ai
CustomGPT.ai pricing guide
Map CustomGPT.ai pricing across Standard, Premium, and Enterprise so support leaders can budget around query volume, document limits, agents, team members, and white-label needs.
- Starting price
- Standard: $99/mo
- Best for
- Support, ecommerce, and customer-success teams that need a branded chatbot grounded in their own content with clear query and document limits.
- Avoid if
- The team still needs one general assistant for writing, research, meetings, analysis, and internal productivity before buying a specialist support bot.
Next compare: CustomGPT.ai vs ChatGPT
Figma Make
Figma Make pricing guide
Break down Figma Make pricing through Figma's seat model so buyers can understand where prompt-to-app creation, AI credits, Dev Mode context, MCP support, and organization controls enter the budget.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Professional Full: $16/mo
- Best for
- Design-led product teams that want functional prototypes from Figma context and already expect to buy Professional, Organization, or Enterprise Full seats for design-system work.
- Avoid if
- Avoid using Figma Make as the default app-builder if the buyer wants a code-first workspace, predictable app-hosting economics, or an app-generation surface that is independent from Figma seats and AI credit limits.
Next compare: Lovable vs Figma Make
Gemini Code Assist
Gemini Code Assist pricing guide
Map Gemini Code Assist pricing across the no-cost individual tier, Standard, and Enterprise so engineering teams can decide when Google-platform coding help is worth a paid rollout.
- Starting price
- Standard: $22.80/mo
- Best for
- Google Cloud-oriented teams that want one coding assistant spanning IDEs, CLI, Cloud surfaces, usage metrics, and enterprise controls.
- Avoid if
- The team mostly needs a GitHub-native baseline seat, a specialized coding editor, or the lowest-cost coding subscription.
Next compare: Gemini Code Assist vs GitHub Copilot
Glean
Glean pricing guide
Explain Glean's sales-led enterprise pricing posture so buyers can decide when a governed company-knowledge layer is worth a custom procurement cycle.
- Starting price
- Custom quote or no public paid floor
- Best for
- Enterprises with real cross-system knowledge sprawl, sensitive permissions, and multiple assistants or agents that need the same trusted context layer.
- Avoid if
- The team mostly works inside one suite, needs a transparent self-serve seat, or has not yet proven that company-knowledge retrieval is a budget-level problem.
Next compare: Glean vs Atlassian Rovo
Grok
Grok pricing guide
Map Grok's separate Business seat, API, and voice-bot meters so teams can decide which xAI surface deserves a bounded pilot instead of treating every Grok capability as one subscription.
- Starting price
- Business: $30/mo
- Best for
- Teams with one defined xAI pilot: a connector-backed assistant, scheduled automation, a reviewed voice-bot call flow, or a Grok Build workflow. The buyer needs a separate owner and budget for each meter.
- Avoid if
- Avoid Grok as the default team standard if the buyer needs the most mature connector ecosystem, a fully proven customer-contact channel, or a procurement path already standardized on Microsoft, Google, OpenAI, or Anthropic.
Next compare: ChatGPT vs Grok
Lovable
Lovable pricing guide
Break down Lovable pricing across Free, Pro, Business, and Enterprise so app-builder buyers can compare shared workspace economics, credits, governance, and internal publishing needs.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Pro: $25/mo
- Best for
- Product, design, and operations teams that want a shared AI app-builder surface and expect more than one person to participate in generation, review, publishing, and iteration.
- Avoid if
- Avoid Lovable if the buyer wants a deeper browser-native coding environment, a Vercel-native generation and deployment loop, or a more predictable credit model for large engineering builds.
Next compare: Bolt vs Lovable
Microsoft 365 Copilot Business
Microsoft 365 Copilot Business pricing guide
Compare Microsoft Copilot for Business pricing for buyers who care more about suite-native rollout economics, qualifying-license realities, and bundle paths than a standalone AI lab seat.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Copilot Business add-on: $25.20/mo
- Best for
- Microsoft-first teams that want admin familiarity and suite-native deployment more than best-in-class model breadth.
- Avoid if
- You are still choosing between suites or you need the best standalone assistant quality before integration convenience.
Next compare: Microsoft 365 Copilot Business vs ChatGPT
NotebookLM
NotebookLM pricing guide
Explain NotebookLM pricing and limits across the free Standard experience, paid Google AI plan access, and Workspace-style usage so buyers understand notebook, source, chat, and overview limits.
- Starting price
- Custom quote or no public paid floor
- Best for
- Researchers, educators, analysts, and knowledge teams that need source-grounded summaries, audio or video overviews, and document Q&A without turning the workflow into a full enterprise search rollout.
- Avoid if
- Avoid NotebookLM as the main paid knowledge platform if the buyer needs company-wide search, governed connectors across many business systems, or a more general-purpose assistant for writing, analysis, coding, and workflow automation.
Next compare: NotebookLM vs Notion AI
Replit
Replit pricing guide
Break down Replit pricing across Starter, Core, Pro, and Enterprise so app-builder buyers budget for credits, Agent effort, active background-task capacity, collaborators, deployment, databases, and security controls.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Core: $25/mo
- Best for
- Builders, founders, product teams, and engineering-adjacent teams that want AI-assisted app creation, code editing, collaboration, databases, and deployment without stitching together a separate local development stack.
- Avoid if
- Avoid Replit when the buyer mainly needs prompt-to-front-end generation, a design-native workflow, or a Vercel-native delivery path rather than a fuller browser coding environment.
Next compare: Bolt vs Replit
Synthesia
Synthesia pricing guide
Map Synthesia pricing for AI avatar video buyers so training, enablement, and marketing teams can compare free experimentation, paid video minutes, editors, guests, avatars, localization, and enterprise controls.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Starter: $29/mo
- Best for
- Learning and development, sales enablement, customer education, and operations teams that need consistent avatar-led videos, localization, and reusable production workflows.
- Avoid if
- Avoid Synthesia if the buyer mainly wants short social ad variants, looser creative text-to-video experimentation, or a low-cost creator tool rather than a governed business video platform.
Next compare: Synthesia vs Zebracat
v0
v0 pricing guide
Break down v0 pricing across Free, Team, Business, Enterprise, included credits, daily login credits, shared extra credits, collaboration, deployment, and data-control requirements.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Team: $30/mo
- Best for
- Frontend, product, and full-stack teams that expect generated work to move quickly into GitHub and Vercel deployment instead of staying as isolated prompt output.
- Avoid if
- Avoid v0 if the buyer needs a stack-neutral app-builder, a fuller browser IDE, or collaboration economics that are not tied to per-user team pricing and usage credits.
Next compare: Bolt vs v0
Devin Desktop (Windsurf)
Windsurf pricing guide
Break down Windsurf's Free, Pro, Max, Teams, and Enterprise tiers so coding teams can see when a premium agentic editor beats cheaper developer coverage.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Pro: $20/mo
- Best for
- Developers and engineering teams comparing agent-first IDE workflows against Cursor and GitHub Copilot, especially when admin analytics, SSO, RBAC, or centralized billing matter.
- Avoid if
- You mainly need a predictable low-cost coding assistant across many engineers and do not expect the team to use Cascade or cloud-agent workflows heavily.
Next compare: Cursor vs Devin Desktop (Windsurf)
Zebracat
Zebracat pricing guide
Explain Zebracat pricing for marketing and social-video teams that need to compare free experimentation, Cat Mode, Super Cat, Unlimited Cat, video volume, and generative-credit capacity.
- Starting price
- Free tier; Cat Mode: $39/mo
- Best for
- Marketing, product marketing, and social teams that need to repurpose written material into many short videos and iterate quickly across campaign variants.
- Avoid if
- Avoid Zebracat when the primary job is formal training, onboarding, or long-lived business video and the buyer needs the public SSO, SCORM, and security documentation that Synthesia publishes. Both vendors still require a use-case-specific security review.
Next compare: Synthesia vs Zebracat