Editorial policy
What is editorial judgment, and what is commercial infrastructure
This policy separates recommendation logic from monetization plumbing so buyers can understand what does and does not move a rank.
Editorial policy
Editorial independence
Rankings, verdicts, fit narratives, common mistakes, and shortlist recommendations are editorial outputs. They are based on workflow match and documented tradeoffs, not on whether a tool has a monetizable route.
A commercial relationship does not guarantee a better position, and lack of one does not remove a tool from consideration when the workflow match is strong.
Editorial policy
What can move a rank
Ranks can move when the underlying buying case moves: workflow match, rollout overhead, published pricing shape, plan prerequisites, governance posture, or a recent product change that materially affects how the tool should be bought.
What does not move a rank is whether the tool has an affiliate path, a redirect route, or a monetizable CTA. Commercial infrastructure is downstream from the editorial call, not the other way around.
Editorial policy
Commercial links
Outbound commercial calls use dedicated redirect routes so attribution, disclosure, and future affiliate parameters can be handled consistently.
Source and verification links remain editorial links. They are kept separate from conversion-oriented calls to action.
Editorial policy
Disclosures and labeling
Commercial intent should be visible. Official, affiliate, and sponsored paths are treated as different link types so a buyer can tell whether the page is citing evidence or sending them to a conversion path.
The goal of disclosure is not legal box-checking alone. It is to keep the reader clear on what is evidence, what is navigation, and what is monetizable routing.
Editorial policy
Coverage gaps and corrections
If a comparison, price path, or rollout claim is not strong enough to support a confident recommendation, AgentHub prefers to leave the gap visible rather than fake completeness. Narrow scope is better than invented certainty.
When a product changes in a way that affects the buying story, the right correction is to update the recommendation language or caveat, not to preserve an old rank for consistency theater.
Editorial policy
What we avoid
We avoid publishing filler rankings, fake review counts, invented benchmark claims, or unsupported product positioning.
If a comparison is missing, we prefer to leave the gap explicit instead of pretending the page exists.