Buy
Buy Devin when this is your buying shape
Teams with recurring migrations, cleanup tickets, bug queues, or implementation chores that can be delegated, reviewed, and merged safely. Starting price signal: $20 /mo.
Answer first
Devin pricing guide
Devin pricing is easiest to justify when the buyer is paying for delegated engineering output, not just a faster developer cockpit.
Best for
Teams with recurring migrations, cleanup tickets, bug queues, or implementation chores that can be delegated, reviewed, and merged safely.
Avoid if
The team mainly needs everyday coding help, broad seat coverage, or cheap autocomplete rather than autonomous task completion.
Starting price
$20 /mo
Last verified
Aug 7, 2026
Last verified: Aug 7, 20263 official sourcesReviewed by: AgentHub Editorial
AgentHub Editorial review: Aug 7, 2026
Model Devin Teams as a base plan plus full-dev capacity, then validate whether the backlog has enough reviewable work to justify usage beyond the headline subscription price.
Methods: official sources · pricing scenarios · change log
Source access snapshot: Aug 7, 2026 · 2 official URLs
Some links on AgentHub may be affiliate or partner links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Watchlist
Track changes for this shortlist
Save the stack, monitor buying-impact changes, and turn the result into a decision memo.
Buy / switch / wait
Devin budget decision rules
Use the pricing guide as an action filter: when to pay, when to compare a replacement, and when to pause for verification.
Switch
Switch-check GitHub Copilot when the avoid condition applies
The team mainly needs everyday coding help, broad seat coverage, or cheap autocomplete rather than autonomous task completion.
Wait
Wait when the latest change or public pricing does not support the budget call
No recent change is large enough to move the buying call, so verify plan terms and expected usage before renewal or rollout.
Plan snapshot
Published plan snapshot
These rows keep the pricing read anchored to what the vendor currently publishes.
Free tier available · Paid from $20/mo
Free
$0 / month
No annual price published
- Limited Devin usage
- Devin Review
- DeepWiki
Pro
Popular$20 / month
No annual price published
- Everything in Free
- Devin usage quota
- Windsurf IDE usage quota
- Pay-as-you-go for usage past quota
Max
$200 / month
No annual price published
- Everything in Pro
- Increased Devin usage quota
- Increased Windsurf IDE usage quota
Teams
Popular$80 / month
No annual price published
- Everything in Pro
- Unlimited flex seats for the team plan
- Full dev seats add $40/month each
- Share and collaborate
Enterprise
Custom quote
No annual price published
- Everything in Teams
- Devin Enterprise
- VPC deployment
- SAML and OIDC SSO
Cost scenarios
Devin published pricing by team size
These monthly scenarios use published pricing and exclude taxes, negotiated discounts, and unlisted usage overage.
| Scenario | Team | Monthly cost | Assumption | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Devin Pro user | 1 | $20 | One Pro subscription before usage beyond the included quota. | Aug 7, 2026 |
| Five Team full-dev users | 5 | $280 | One $80 Teams base plan plus five $40 per-month full dev seats; usage beyond included quota is excluded. | Aug 7, 2026 |
| Twenty-five Team full-dev users | 25 | $1,080 | One $80 Teams base plan plus twenty-five $40 per-month full dev seats; usage beyond included quota is excluded. | Aug 7, 2026 |
Pricing guide
Keep the decision moving
Use these links when the pricing read alone is not enough to close the decision.
ResearchAI agent pricing and change indexCompare core tool costs and buyer-impact changes on consistent assumptions.Related compareDevin vs GitHub CopilotDevin is the better buy for autonomous engineering execution. GitHub Copilot is the better buy for cheaper, governance-first developer assistance across a broad engineering org.Related compareDevin vs CursorCursor is the better default buy for a human-in-the-loop coding workspace. Devin is the better specialist buy when the company wants autonomous engineering execution on tickets, migrations, and backlog work rather than a smarter coding cockpit.Top alternativeCompare top alternativeTeams with recurring migrations, cleanup tickets, bug queues, or implementation chores that can be delegated, reviewed, and merged safely.
FAQ
The long-tail questions buyers ask before they pick a side
These answers stay visible on-page so the comparison can serve both direct readers and search-driven visitors.
Start with Pro when the goal is to validate task fit, review workflow, and usage patterns before standardizing collaboration and admin controls. Teams is more compelling once multiple people need shared access, centralized billing, and analytics around recurring delegated work.
Usually no. Devin is better modeled as a delegated-work budget for selected backlog, migration, and maintenance tasks. Standard coding seats still matter for the engineers who scope, review, and merge the work.
The risk is assuming the published plan price is the full cost. Buyers should model delegated task volume, review time, usage beyond included quota, and whether the output reduces enough engineering hours to justify the spend.
Commercial next step
Check the current vendor offer
Use the official pricing or trial path once the pricing guide matches your shortlist.