Hobby
$0 / month
$0 per seat / month on annual billing
- No credit card required
- Limited Agent requests
- Limited Tab completions
Answer first
What matters before you scroll
This block compresses the recommendation, buyer fit, price floor, and freshness signal into one scan.
Verdict
Cursor pricing works when the team will use Cursor 3 as a managed agent workspace, not just as another autocomplete seat.
Best for
Engineering teams that will regularly use the Agents Window, local-cloud handoff, shared MCP workflows, or Design Mode strongly enough to justify premium seat cost.
Avoid if
You mainly need cheaper broad developer coverage and do not expect premium multi-agent workflow depth or self-hosted security advantages to become normal.
Starting price
$20 /mo
Updated because: Cursor should now be compared less like a premium autocomplete editor and more like a dedicated coding workspace for teams that want human-in-the-loop agent orchestration. That strengthens Cursor against Copilot, Windsurf, ChatGPT, Replit, and even Devin where orchestration depth matters more than simple seat price.
Pricing guide
Cursor pricing guide
Break down Cursor's Hobby, Pro, Pro+, Ultra, Teams, and Enterprise tiers so buyers can see when Cursor 3's unified agent workspace is worth paying more than a cheaper coding seat.
Some links on AgentHub may be affiliate or partner links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Plan snapshot
Published plan snapshot
These rows keep the pricing read anchored to what the vendor currently publishes.
Free tier available · Paid from $20/mo
Pro
$20 / month
No annual price published
- Extended Agent limits
- Access to frontier models
- MCPs, skills, and hooks
- Cloud agents
Pro+
$60 / month
No annual price published
- More included agent usage
- Priority frontier-model access
- Expanded MAX mode
- MCPs, skills, hooks, and cloud agents
Ultra
$200 / month
No annual price published
- Highest included usage
- Maximum MAX mode access
- Priority frontier-model access
- Best for power users
Teams
$40 / month
No annual price published
- Shared chats, commands, and rules
- Centralized team billing
- $20 monthly included usage per user
- Usage analytics and reporting
- Org-wide privacy mode controls
- Role-based access control
- SAML/OIDC SSO
Enterprise
Custom quote
No annual price published
- Pooled usage
- Invoice or PO billing
- SCIM seat management
- Audit logs and admin controls
- AI code tracking API
Best for
Who should pay for this
Engineering teams that will regularly use the Agents Window, local-cloud handoff, shared MCP workflows, or Design Mode strongly enough to justify premium seat cost.
Avoid if
Who should not pay for this
You mainly need cheaper broad developer coverage and do not expect premium multi-agent workflow depth or self-hosted security advantages to become normal.
Pricing guide
Keep the decision moving
Use these links when the pricing read alone is not enough to close the decision.
Related compare
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Cursor wins when an engineering team wants a unified agent workspace with the deepest IDE-native coding flow. GitHub Copilot wins when GitHub-centric rollout, policy control, and seat efficiency matter more than Cursor 3's premium workflow depth.
Related compare
Cursor vs Windsurf
Cursor is the safer premium coding-seat buy for most teams because Cursor 3 now combines multi-workspace agent orchestration, clearer buying path, and stronger governance. Windsurf is the better buy when the team explicitly wants a more opinionated Cascade-first editor feel.
Related compare
Cursor vs ChatGPT
Cursor is the better buy when the seat is specifically about a dedicated coding cockpit with parallel agents and IDE fallback. ChatGPT is the better buy when the same subscription has to cover coding, research, writing, and mixed-role work outside engineering.
Top alternative
Compare top alternative
Engineering teams that will regularly use the Agents Window, local-cloud handoff, shared MCP workflows, or Design Mode strongly enough to justify premium seat cost.
FAQ
The long-tail questions buyers ask before they pick a side
These answers stay visible on-page so the comparison can serve both direct readers and search-driven visitors.
Cursor Teams is worth it when the team will actually use Cursor 3's multi-agent workflow depth, local-cloud handoff, or shared MCP and marketplace setup rather than only wanting broad coding coverage. If the daily behavior still looks like standard coding assistance, Copilot Business stays easier to defend financially.
Yes. Cursor now explicitly recommends Pro+ for daily agent users and Ultra for power users, which makes the heavy-user ladder clearer than before. Those plans make more sense once one person is running enough parallel or long-lived agent work that the base Pro tier becomes a bottleneck.
They can be. Self-hosted cloud agents matter when the team wants cloud-agent execution speed but must keep code, secrets, and build outputs inside its own network. That is a real buying distinction versus cheaper tools that are easier to approve only because they ask less of the environment.
It is enough to validate the interface and general workflow feel, but not enough to model sustained team usage or the economics of agent-heavy development. You need at least Pro or Teams to see whether the workflow depth really pays back.
Commercial next step
Check the current vendor offer
Use the official pricing or trial path once the pricing guide matches your shortlist.