Pricing guide

Cursor pricing guide

Compare Cursor Pro and Teams pricing, annual seat rates, included usage pools, Auto routing costs, token-rate exposure, and spending controls.

Pro at $20 is the paid entry point. Teams Standard is $40/user/month ($32 annual equivalent), while Premium is $120/user/month ($96 annual equivalent) for 5x Standard usage. Each paid team seat has separate per-user pools that reset each billing cycle, not a shared team allowance. After included usage is consumed, on-demand use can continue; all Auto modes bill at the routed model's list price, and third-party requests also add the $0.25-per-million-token Cursor Token Rate. Set per-user limits before rollout.

Last verified: Sep 5, 2026

AgentHub review: Sep 5, 2026

Buy Cursor Teams for concentrated power users who will use the agent workspace daily, not for a blanket engineering rollout. Budget monthly seats and annual savings separately from per-user pools, third-party token-rate exposure, and the on-demand decision.

Review methods: Official sources · Cost calculations · Change history

Sources checked: Sep 5, 2026 · 3 official sources

Choosing a plan

Cursor pricing works when the team will use it as a managed agent workspace, not just as another autocomplete seat. For a team, price the $40/month Standard or $120/month Premium seat first, then model the separate per-user usage pools, on-demand continuation, and Auto routing exposure. Every Auto request is billed at the routed model's list price; third-party requests also add Cursor's Token Rate.

Good fit for

Engineering teams that will regularly use the Agents Window, local-cloud handoff, shared MCP workflows, or Design Mode strongly enough to justify premium seat cost.

Consider alternatives for

You mainly need cheaper broad developer coverage and do not expect premium multi-agent workflow depth or self-hosted security advantages to become normal.

Cost examples by team size

Excludes taxes, negotiated discounts, and unstated overages. Check the assumptions and sources for each example.

One Cursor Pro seat

1 seats

$20/month

One individual Cursor Pro subscription at the published monthly entry price. This is the seat price only; compare the actual usage pool and model-routing behavior before treating it as an all-in agent budget.

Five Teams Standard seats

5 seats

$200/month

Five monthly Teams Standard seats at $40/user/month. Each user's included pools are separate and non-transferable; this excludes on-demand use after the included pools are consumed.

Twenty-five Teams Standard seats

25 seats

$1,000/month

Twenty-five monthly Teams Standard seats at $40/user/month. Use per-user spending limits and decide whether on-demand usage stays enabled before scaling, because every Auto request follows the routed model's list price and third-party requests also add the Cursor Token Rate.

Plan details

Cursor published plans

Confirm features and limits against the supplier's current source before buying.

Free plan available · Paid from $20/mo

Teams Standard

$40 / month

$32 per seat / month on annual billing

  • Shared chats, commands, and rules
  • Centralized team billing
  • Standard seat usage allowance; $32/user/mo on an annual plan
  • Premium seat option at $120/user/mo or $96/user/mo annually with 5x Standard usage
Verification status
Review required · 31 days since verification
Last checked
Sep 5, 2026
Scope
Global English availability · Plan: Team
Official pricing

Pricing questions

Questions to resolve before approving a budget

When is Cursor Teams worth the premium over GitHub Copilot Business?
Cursor Teams is worth it when the team will actually use Cursor 3's multi-agent workflow depth, local-cloud handoff, or shared MCP and marketplace setup rather than only wanting broad coding coverage. If the daily behavior still looks like standard coding assistance, Copilot Business stays easier to defend financially, especially because Cursor Teams usage is allocated per user unless the buyer moves to Enterprise pooled usage.
Can Cursor's Auto router increase spend beyond the seat price?
Yes. Current Cursor documentation says every Auto mode bills at the list price of the model selected for each request. Third-party requests also carry Cursor's $0.25-per-million-token Token Rate. Use per-user spending limits and inspect the separate Cursor Models and Other Models pools before treating an agent-heavy workflow as a fixed-seat program.
Does Cursor 3 change who should buy Pro+ or Ultra?
Yes. Cursor now explicitly recommends Pro+ for daily agent users and Ultra for power users, which makes the heavy-user ladder clearer than before. Those plans make more sense once one person is running enough parallel or long-lived agent work that the base Pro tier becomes a bottleneck.
Are self-hosted cloud agents a reason to budget for Cursor Enterprise?
They can be. Self-hosted cloud agents matter when the team wants cloud-agent execution speed but must keep code, secrets, and build outputs inside its own network. That is a real buying distinction versus cheaper tools that are easier to approve only because they ask less of the environment.
Is the free Cursor tier enough for evaluation?
It is enough to validate the interface and general workflow feel, but not enough to model sustained team usage or the economics of agent-heavy development. You need at least Pro or Teams to see whether the workflow depth really pays back.
When is a Cursor Teams annual commitment worth it?
Use an annual commitment only after the team has shown stable, recurring need for the workspace. Cursor publishes Standard at $32/user/month annually versus $40 monthly, and Premium at $96 versus $120. The discount does not remove usage governance: each paid seat has its own pools, and on-demand use can continue after those pools are consumed.

Next decision

Do not decide from price alone

Pair the price model with a fit review, alternatives, and the change record.

Cursor Pricing: Teams, Usage & Overage | AgentHub