AgentHub Recipes

Tool comparison

Cursor vs Devin

Cursor is the better default buy for a human-in-the-loop coding workspace. Devin is the better specialist buy when the company wants autonomous engineering execution on tickets, migrations, and backlog work rather than a smarter coding cockpit.

Last updated: Sep 7, 2026

A wins when

Cursor

Cursor is easiest to justify when developers need a dedicated coding workspace that can orchestrate local and cloud agents across repos, not just a cheaper autocomplete seat. Treat its Auto router as a governed usage policy as well as a quality setting: every Auto request is billed at the routed model's list price, and third-party requests also carry the Cursor Token Rate.

Starts at
$20 /mo
Best for
Coding • 10/10
Watchout
It is still a weak fit for writing, meetings, and general knowledge work outside engineering.
Official pricing

B wins when

Devin

Devin is easiest to justify when the buyer wants autonomous engineering execution on tickets, migrations, and backlog work rather than a cheaper assistant that still requires the human to do nearly all of the work.

Starts at
$20 /mo
Best for
Automation • 9/10
Watchout
It is not a cheap default coding seat for every developer.
Official pricing
Last verified: Sep 5, 2026
Cursor pricingCursor 3 announcementCursor 3.0 changelogDevin pricingDevinDevin Advanced CapabilitiesHow we evaluate

Decision desk

Start with the buying call, then expand the evidence.

Cursor is the better default buy for a human-in-the-loop coding workspace. Devin is the better specialist buy when the company wants autonomous engineering execution on tickets, migrations, and backlog work rather than a smarter coding cockpit.

Best for teams

Choose Cursor for daily developer throughput. Pilot Devin for selected backlog or migration work, with the team subscription formula, full/flex seat mix, shared usage budget, and review effort confirmed before expansion.

Individual lens

Choose Cursor for the default coding seat. Choose Devin only if autonomous engineering output is the thing you are really buying.

Price pressure

Cursor is $200/month lower for the selected team size.

Change impact

A September 7 pricing review found conflicting Devin Teams formulas: the price page adds $80/month to $40 per full seat, while the billing guide treats $80 as a minimum satisfied by full-seat charges. For five full seats, those produce $280 and $200 subscription scenarios, respectively, before extra usage. Neither is a confirmed quote. Confirm the applicable billing formula before comparing Devin with Cursor, and judge delegated work by accepted output and review cost rather than a presumed fixed surcharge.

Next action

Adjust team size for pricing pressure, then save the shortlist and share the decision memo.

Evidence status

Review pricing, feature, and change evidence before you commit to a rollout or renewal.

Decision handoff

Review evidence, then finish with a shortlist and memo

  1. 1. Review pricing, feature, and change evidence
  2. 2. Save the two tools as a team shortlist
  3. 3. Copy the evidence-backed decision memo

Save the shortlist before copying the memo.

Buy / switch / wait

Turn the comparison into a next-action rule

The verdict, recent delta, and pricing pressure are separated into action rules so rollout or renewal decisions do not stay abstract.

Buy

Buy when the team verdict matches your rollout context

Choose Cursor for broad developer rollout; choose Devin for narrower high-value execution workflows.

Switch

Switch when a recent Cursor or Devin update changes the recommendation

A September 7 pricing review found conflicting Devin Teams formulas: the price page adds $80/month to $40 per full seat, while the billing guide treats $80 as a minimum satisfied by full-seat charges. For five full seats, those produce $280 and $200 subscription scenarios, respectively, before extra usage. Neither is a confirmed quote. Confirm the applicable billing formula before comparing Devin with Cursor, and judge delegated work by accepted output and review cost rather than a presumed fixed surcharge.

Wait

Wait until you compare the Cursor alternative path

Cursor is $200/month lower for the selected team size.

Individual plans

For individual use

Compare features and costs for an individual subscription.

Choose Cursor for the default coding seat. Choose Devin only if autonomous engineering output is the thing you are really buying.

Some links on AgentHub may be affiliate or partner links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more

Team size

Change the team size to compare monthly costs.

5

Pricing

Subscription cost by team size

Estimated costs based on published prices. 5 seats

Cursor
$200

Estimated monthly cost

Best published plan: Teams Standard

Devin
$400

Estimated monthly cost

Best published plan: Teams

Cursor is cheaper per month by $200.

Features

Key feature differences

Compare available features and usage terms.

role

Primary product role

Cursor leans Human-in-the-loop coding workspace, while Devin leans Autonomous engineering execution layer.

Cursor

Human-in-the-loop coding workspace

Devin

Autonomous engineering execution layer

pricing

Published team economics

Devin pricing and self-serve billing documentation were rechecked September 7, 2026. The interval reflects two published formulas, not a promised discount or a cap on total spending.

Cursor

$20 Pro and $40 Teams per user monthly

Devin

Individual: $20 Pro or $200 Max. Teams sources conflict: $80 + $40 per full seat on the price page, versus an $80 minimum in the billing guide. Five full seats: $200–280 subscription scenarios before extra usage; confirm the quote.

best-fit

What you are really buying

Cursor leans Faster human coding flow plus agent orchestration inside the workspace, while Devin leans Autonomous completion of selected engineering work.

Cursor

Faster human coding flow plus agent orchestration inside the workspace

Devin

Autonomous completion of selected engineering work

Choosing a tool

Recommendations by user

Find the recommendation for your individual, team, or enterprise needs.

Individual

Choose Cursor for the default coding seat. Choose Devin only if autonomous engineering output is the thing you are really buying.

Team

Choose Cursor for daily developer throughput. Pilot Devin for selected backlog or migration work, with the team subscription formula, full/flex seat mix, shared usage budget, and review effort confirmed before expansion.

Enterprise

Enterprise buyers should treat this as standard coding workspace versus specialist autonomous engineering layer.

Deeper evidenceExpand benchmarks and fit scoresCompare fit scores and benchmarks to narrow the right choice for your team.

Fit by use case

Fit across seven use cases

Scores are averaged across individual, team, and enterprise use.

Fit score

Coding

Cursor

Individual 10 • Team 10 • Enterprise 9

Cross-segment average9.7/10

Devin

Individual 6 • Team 8 • Enterprise 8

Cross-segment average7.3/10

Fit score

Research

Cursor

Individual 6 • Team 6 • Enterprise 6

Cross-segment average6/10

Devin

Individual 3 • Team 3 • Enterprise 3

Cross-segment average3/10

Fit score

Automation

Cursor

Individual 8 • Team 9 • Enterprise 9

Cross-segment average8.7/10

Devin

Individual 9 • Team 10 • Enterprise 10

Cross-segment average9.7/10

Fit score

Writing

Cursor

Individual 4 • Team 4 • Enterprise 3

Cross-segment average3.7/10

Devin

Individual 1 • Team 1 • Enterprise 1

Cross-segment average1/10

Recent changes

What changed recently

A September 7 pricing review found conflicting Devin Teams formulas: the price page adds $80/month to $40 per full seat, while the billing guide treats $80 as a minimum satisfied by full-seat charges. For five full seats, those produce $280 and $200 subscription scenarios, respectively, before extra usage. Neither is a confirmed quote. Confirm the applicable billing formula before comparing Devin with Cursor, and judge delegated work by accepted output and review cost rather than a presumed fixed surcharge.

FAQCommon questionsCheck pricing, features, and switching requirements.

FAQ

Common questions

Check pricing, features, and switching requirements.

Which is better for individuals: Cursor or Devin?
Choose Cursor for the everyday coding seat; choose Devin only for autonomous engineering value.
Which is better for teams: Cursor or Devin?
Choose Cursor for broad developer rollout; choose Devin for narrower high-value execution workflows.
Which tool has a free tier?
Cursor still has a free tier. Devin is mainly a paid decision once you need consistent usage or team controls.
Which tool starts cheaper?
Cursor and Devin start at the same published paid price: $20/month before usage or team add-ons change the story.
Can I use Cursor and Devin together?
Yes. A split-seat setup makes sense when one tool covers the default workflow and the other handles the narrower job it clearly does better.
What is the main tradeoff in Cursor vs Devin?
Cursor is the better default buy for a human-in-the-loop coding workspace. Devin is the better specialist buy when the company wants autonomous engineering execution on tickets, migrations, and backlog work rather than a smarter coding cockpit.
Which is easier to standardize across a company?
Choose Cursor for standard engineering seats; choose Devin for specialist autonomous execution pockets.
Does Devin Teams cost $200 or $280 for five full seats?
The official sources disagree. The price page formula, $80 + $40 × 5, gives $280/month; the self-serve billing guide formula, max($80, $40 × 5), gives $200/month. Treat $200–280 as subscription planning scenarios and confirm the formula at checkout or with Devin. Extra usage is separate; flex users, Automations, and Devin Review can draw from shared on-demand credits.
Is Cursor better than Devin?
Cursor is the better default buy for a human-in-the-loop coding workspace. Devin is the better specialist buy when the company wants autonomous engineering execution on tickets, migrations, and backlog work rather than a smarter coding cockpit.
How much does Cursor cost?
Cursor has published paid plans starting at $20/month (Pro), and a $0 or included entry is also listed; compare that entry's allowance before treating it as a full free seat.
How much does Devin cost?
Devin has published paid plans starting at $20/month (Pro), and a $0 or included entry is also listed; compare that entry's allowance before treating it as a full free seat.
Which tool is cheaper for team rollout?
Cursor is currently cheaper for a small team based on the recommended published monthly plan, with a $200/month gap at the default five-seat tier.
Keep comparingRelated comparisonsExplore other candidates and shortlists by use case.

Keep comparing

Related comparisons

Explore other candidates and shortlists by use case.

CursorCursor Read pricing guidePro at $20 is the paid entry point. Teams Standard is $40/user/month ($32 annual equivalent), while Premium is $120/user/month ($96 annual equivalent) for 5x Standard usage. Each paid team seat has separate per-user pools that reset each billing cycle, not a shared team allowance. After included usage is consumed, on-demand use can continue; all Auto modes bill at the routed model's list price, and third-party requests also add the $0.25-per-million-token Cursor Token Rate. Set per-user limits before rollout.DevinDevin Read pricing guidePro is $20/month and Max is $200/month for one user. Teams public pages disagree: pricing shows $80 plus $40 per full seat, while billing docs count $40 seats toward an $80 minimum. Compare both subscription scenarios and confirm checkout before budgeting usage.CursorCursor Read alternatives guideThe best Cursor alternative depends on why the team is hesitating: GitHub Copilot for cheaper governed rollout, Windsurf for another premium agentic editor, Replit for a hosted build-and-run environment, and ChatGPT when one seat has to cover more than coding.DevinDevin Read alternatives guideThe best Devin alternative depends on why Devin feels risky: GitHub Copilot for governed broad rollout, Cursor for a premium coding workspace, and Gemini Code Assist for Google Cloud-heavy teams.Use casesAI backlog automation for enterprise engineering: fit guideFor engineering leaders deciding whether AI should merely assist on tickets or own bounded migration, refactor, and repetitive-work packages with explicit acceptance, review, rollback, and spend controls.ChangesSee recent changes affecting Cursor and DevinA September 7 pricing review found conflicting Devin Teams formulas: the price page adds $80/month to $40 per full seat, while the billing guide treats $80 as a minimum satisfied by full-seat charges. For five full seats, those produce $280 and $200 subscription scenarios, respectively, before extra usage. Neither is a confirmed quote. Confirm the applicable billing formula before comparing Devin with Cursor, and judge delegated work by accepted output and review cost rather than a presumed fixed surcharge.
Cursor vs Devin (2026): pricing, features, and best choice | AgentHub